Blogged with Flock
Thursday, 20 December 2007
The Four Horsemen debate
The Four Horsemen: Hitchens, Dawkins, Harris and Dennett together at last, 17/12/07, George Eaton's Blog
Friday, 14 December 2007
Thursday, 13 December 2007
Latte art
I've been keeping an eye on coffee crema art for a while now.
Blog queen GwenBell has uploaded some beauties
I plan to get my own efforts up and running in the new year. So you'll have to come down to the centre on Saturdays to see how I'm getting on! :)
L'art'e - geddit?!
Blog queen GwenBell has uploaded some beauties
I plan to get my own efforts up and running in the new year. So you'll have to come down to the centre on Saturdays to see how I'm getting on! :)
L'art'e - geddit?!
Blogged with Flock
Wednesday, 12 December 2007
Which Philosopher Are YOU?
I'm proud to be sussed as W.v.O. Quine / Late Wittgenstein
Early Wittgenstein would have been annoying and W.v.O. Quine is pleasing now I'm reading Dennett.
Early Wittgenstein would have been annoying and W.v.O. Quine is pleasing now I'm reading Dennett.
Which philosopher are you? Your Result: W.v.O. Quine / Late Wittgenstein There is no provable absolute truth. The way you see things is dependant on your language. Truths exist only within a language, and change as the language does. | |
Early Wittgenstein / Positivists | |
Sartre/Camus (late existentialists) | |
Immanuel Kant | |
Nietzsche | |
Aristotle | |
Plato (strict rationalists) | |
Which philosopher are you? Take More Quizzes |
Blogged with Flock
Thursday, 29 November 2007
Thursday, 8 November 2007
Tuesday, 6 November 2007
base-jumping
this video fills me with so much internal tension. And, later, release, that I just had to post it as I want to watch it again and again.
Monday, 5 November 2007
Thursday, 1 November 2007
Wednesday, 31 October 2007
Monday, 29 October 2007
Why I am “Integral” « both/and
"Being truly integral means, among other things, developing intimacy with everything that constitutes us. A genuinely integral consciousness lives such intimacy both conceptually and nonconceptually."
Why I am “Integral” « both/and
Why I am “Integral” « both/and
Thursday, 18 October 2007
MySpace.com - Girl Talk - Pittsburgh, PA - Pop / Pop / Pop - www.myspace.com/girltalkmusic
MySpace.com - Girl Talk - Pittsburgh, PA - Pop / Pop / Pop - www.myspace.com/girltalkmusic
This guy ROCKS... and I so rarely say that about ANY music. I do like the new Radiohead album but this is just something else.
Thanks to RyanIsHungry - Hacking Everyday Life for the tipoff.
This guy ROCKS... and I so rarely say that about ANY music. I do like the new Radiohead album but this is just something else.
Thanks to RyanIsHungry - Hacking Everyday Life for the tipoff.
Wednesday, 19 September 2007
Ideas to die for « both/and
Crosspost from: Ideas to die for « both/and
Dan Dennett on Ants, terrorism, and the awesome power of the meme.
Memes. Fit for their own survival. Not yours.
Sunday, 16 September 2007
Integral Options Cafe: The Failure of the Loud Atheists
Thank you Integral Options Cafe for not lumping Dan Dennett in with the fundamentalist, or Loud, athiests - a habit I've been very keen to dispell recently. Haidt's essay is a good example of where people are mis-understanding Dennett.
As you say in The Failure of the Loud Atheists the biggest flaw of the atheist fundamentalists "is their failure to distinguish between objective reality and subjective reality". Now Dennett, in both 'Breaking the Spell' and 'Consciousness Explained' is playing a completely different game and to roll him up into the angry atheist crowd is mis-reading him almost completely.
Dennett recognises interiors and exteriors. He recognises evolution and development. He recognises the difference between left and right-hand quadrants (although wouldn't use those terms). And he states clearly that 3rd person methodologies have a large part to play in understanding interiors. He's got at least Zone1 and Zone2 of the 8 Integral Methodological Pluralism zones covered and he spotted the blind spot that phenomenology has to structuralism and 3rd person methods. His hetrophenomenological method addressed the problem back in the 1980s.
This, from his latest TED talk, says it nicely.
As you say in The Failure of the Loud Atheists the biggest flaw of the atheist fundamentalists "is their failure to distinguish between objective reality and subjective reality". Now Dennett, in both 'Breaking the Spell' and 'Consciousness Explained' is playing a completely different game and to roll him up into the angry atheist crowd is mis-reading him almost completely.
Dennett recognises interiors and exteriors. He recognises evolution and development. He recognises the difference between left and right-hand quadrants (although wouldn't use those terms). And he states clearly that 3rd person methodologies have a large part to play in understanding interiors. He's got at least Zone1 and Zone2 of the 8 Integral Methodological Pluralism zones covered and he spotted the blind spot that phenomenology has to structuralism and 3rd person methods. His hetrophenomenological method addressed the problem back in the 1980s.
This, from his latest TED talk, says it nicely.
"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)